30 Days of Jung — Day 2: #Perception, #Self-Awareness


Welcome back. Today is Day 2 of my series, “30 Days of Jung” wherein I take a famous quote of Carl G. Jung‘s and try to make sense or refute or disavow or disembowel it or where I turn into a heaping pile of mush because of it in 1,000 words or less.

Today’s quote is to me, his most famous and MOST vexing of all:

Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves.― C.G. Jung

Doesn’t that quote just steam your shorts? It’s so smug.

I hate that quote.

I also love it.

That quote has taught me SO much about myself and why I hate it.

It has shown me that when I am irritated by say (hypothetically of course), that my son ate all the Cap’n Crunch and didn’t save me any that I’m mad because he was so selfish. I mean, how could he eat all the cereal?!

Not so fast.

He didn’t sit with a big salad-bowl, pour the entire box and use a massive spoon and all the milk to eat it.

This was not staged.

This was not staged.

But maybe he did. He just happened to have been the final person to eat the last available all-natural, organic, delicious and healthy morsel.

It doesn’t matter. What matters is how I react to his action. If I see him as selfish, I paint him with a broad brush. I have disconnected from him. I begin to feel excluded, angry, and invisible, selfish. He’s the jerk and I get to be the victim. So I am just as selfish for being so mad at him. Suddenly (as in most moments of emotional reactivity), this isn’t about the Cap’n Crunch (as impossible to believe as that may be, especially around here). It’s about something much deeper, what my family friend used to term, “you’re not mad at what you’re mad at.” Your reaction is a projection of how you feel about yourself: invisible, excluded…selfish.

What about people who exhibit arrogance or elitism or another form of threatening behavior: flamboyance, eccentricity, self-promotion, exhibitionism, shyness, reclusiveness, great athletic, artistic prowess or intellectual skills? If we are bothered by it, what are we manifesting in ourselves? Be honest with yourself: that’s where the pay dirt is.

As devastating as it would be for me to lose all those Crunch Berries, it was a benign example of an effrontery. What about much deeper and more harmful offenses? When is it OK for a survivor of an offense (a legitimately upsetting act) to be irritated? I still think the opportunity for a better understanding of self still applies, but on a more sensitive level. We see evidence in the news on a hourly basis that some people have just checked out; they simply don’t possess the bandwidth to care about anyone else. And they’re out there in the millions. I guess, for us to navigate all this in a healthy way for ourselves is to do what we can to alleviate our suffering and that’s likely achievable by looking at our reactions and if we’ve allowed ourselves to identify with those reactions then we’ve allowed those reactions to become part of us.


Don’t go calling me weird and saying I’m overly sensitive. What about Newtown? Virginia Tech? What about when you’ve been hurt or offended? We all have felt hurt.

Maybe you just haven’t admitted it to yourself and the suggestion of your vulnerability proves Jung right. If you deny your hurt, you’re harboring it and letting it become part of you; you can’t process and move on from the denial of a reaction to something. Are you willing to be led to an understanding of yourself? Are you willing to stay mindful about your reactions and feelings toward others in order to gain a better understanding of yourself? It takes a lot of brain power and humility. (That’s why I can’t do it all the time. I’d never get anything done around here. Not that I ever get anything done around here…)

The whole “everything that irritates us about others” thing is all about our release of control and releasing our judgmentalism (which sometimes is really a judgment against ourselves).

Another point: what about the identification with (not of) everything that irritates (a feeling, a sensation, not rational or intellectual at all) us about someone else? The feelings.

Eeew… she said feelings.

To me, this goes back to the “It takes one to know one” rebuke of Lisa Loopner’s (Gilda Radner) when Todd DiLamuca (Bill Murray) would tease Lisa or call her a nerd and she’d say, “It takes one to know one, Taaaaaadddd…” and she would be totally right.

We can’t know (identify with) the selfishness, nerdiness, coldness, arrogance in others unless we possess it ourselves.

Blech. Enough with the psychobabble. I have a headache.

Let’s turn Jung upside down. Let’s replace “irritates” with “enamors.” If he’s suggesting that examining “everything that irritates” can lead to an understanding of ourselves, the same thing can be said of the inverse. The best way to paint something, my mother always said, was to try it upside down. She also said that from a visual standpoint, the way people see us physically is as a reflection of a reflection (like a 3-way mirror). I thought our eyes see things reversed and upside-down but it’s our brain that turns them “right-side” up and in “proper” order. Are we all really upside-down and inverse?

Pass the coffee… or the pillow and blanket.

What about the blasé amongst us? Those who have no opinion? The indifferent who are neither irritated by or enamored with everything about others? Can it be that they are totally enlightened? Mmmmmokay. I would likely propose they just have decided to not bother with it. Am I jealous of them? Hell yes.

Per this inversion, I propose that what we can admire in others can also lead us to a better ability to admire ourselves, and to appreciate ourselves because as Lisa said, “it takes one to know one, Taaaaaadd.”

If you can be kinder to yourself, you can be kinder to others and eventually, just maybe, what “irritates us about others” might not be so much. We will have gotten that much closer to equanimity.

Thank you.

This one was tough.

14 responses »

  1. Loved this. And my head hurts now too. Thank you; I feel so much better to know that there are others who struggle with this inner turmoil as well 🙂

  2. My love for you just grew a thousand fold because we both know that crunch berries is the best version of the Cap’n.

  3. I will give you some sage advice. Go to youtube.com or hulu and put on one of these episodes. Close your eyes and relax to the extent you can. Silently note your reactions. Are the arising in hear (internal talk), see (internal images), or feel (irritation, anger, sadness, confusion, etc.) When you can’t stand it anymore, just rest for a minute. You also might want to try http://www.basicmindfulness.org to learn more.
    As far as Carl Jung, he was a great psychologist and had the guts to tell Freud he was basically wrong in neglecting the spiritual aspects of mankind.

  4. hmmmm…….I like the peanut butter Captain Crunch………Connor loves it…..maybe I will accidentally buy the berries to try ’em…………I am definitely not a thinker……….not a deep one anyway, my head already hurt before I read your post….it hurt just a little more after reading your post 😉 I try not to judge people, I have always tried to put myself in their shoes………..I try to do right, treat right, be right with others……it does not always play out, I forgive easily too…..why is it that so many people can not??

    Something to ponder……………maybe not………because I am not a thinker 😉

    • Hmm. I like the peanut butter too, but the crunch berries are very refreshing and they tear up the insides of mouth in a way that can only be justified by the berries.

      I have a confession: i am hopeful after these 30 days that maybe I won’t be such a deep thinker; that I will have thought myself out and I will be able to be blasé and experienced and patient and not so analytical.

      Do you think that can happen? Do you think I will be freer? It would be nice. I would just like to enjoy the crunch berries and not wonder about what they’re made of…

      I come from a long and storied line of deep thinkers. It would be nice to hang up the cap one day. Truly.

  5. I loved this, too! And my head doesn’t hurt (although it might after I process it all). This is a great insight. I’m going to ponder…

    Thank you for sharing! ❤

  6. Molly it truly is in your DNA………..it will always be a part of who you are……….embrace it! I wish sometimes I were more of a deep thinker, but it is not who I am……..I am trying to embrace it, but as you are probably finding it out it is a difficult thing to do…Believe it or not, it is refreshing to me, to read your posts because it makes me open my eyes……and THINK…..and also almost always put a big smile on my face…..so I have a confession: I do not want you to change too much………uh oh….I am being selfish……….damned Jung………….


  7. I think this is so true. What I have to remind myself is that while it’s good to be curious about my responses to people and to question my part in any interaction, it’s also good to have boundaries. Sometimes those negative feelings are warning signs.

    • Yes, I will write about this more, but even in my drafts of posts, I am feeling things about certain phrases or material and I’ve gone back to cut it out and I’m so glad of it. The feelings… That’s where the pay dirt is.

Whatcha Think, Smahtypants?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s